CAN ONLY LET DEAR JEREMY TELL YOU ABOUT IT
'http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,12529-1890873,00.html'



Read ‘Ishmael’. A 1000 repetitions for all of mankind.
Daniel Quinn makes points and draws images that draw attention to our imminent extinction. We know this. Its already common knowledge that we are heading towards our own death. But to be taught by another of God’s creations gives a wholly different take on it.
So here we go on an Ishmael triggered look at my understanding of my world.
Why am I here- To live and die like all of God’s creations
What do I ultimately want- Shanti [inner stillness]
When will I achieve this- When I die [the rishi`s of the Upanishad`s may have achieved this in this life, but I don’t see myself going through with all that it takes]
Who is my God- the universe in me, around me.
Launchcast is the coolest.
Decided to see what these guy`s meant by personalized music. TO think that they could find all the music in the world that I liked, and play it to me. Anyways that was the hope. And its free and I’ve oodles of time to waste.
So went through the initial shit of known bands and I would like to see on My Station. Then It said I would like to add a few groups, musicians to it. Just what I was looking for. It wanted to play. I would play.
Typed in dire straits. It got it. Antonio Vivaldi, Jethro Tull, Vangelis, Carl orff [ I`ve only heard o`fortuna so I put Carmina Burana on]. It found them and I put them on.
Decided that if I wanted the station to play everything I liked it should play Indian classical. I was getting really hopeful here. Who better than U Srinivas. It FOUND it and I added him on. Dr Chitti Babu, was there. Sudha Ranganathan too.
You can put it in individual albums too. Songs if u like.
I love this, love love love this.
No bollywood music though. Was looking for roja. wasnt there. Maybe some day.
Check out my internet music station if you want. It will be called tallpox`s station i guess on yahoo music.
Why is it that they require you to give them instructions and then do it all wrong. The only time I go to a barber is when I want my hair cut short and hopefully look good at the end of it.
So that’s what I did. Told her that I wanted my hair cut short and now I look like a plucked chicken. And paid 15 dollars for it too.
Damn I hate barbers.
A view from the top of the world.
http://www.panoramas.dk/fullscreen2/full22.html
Nowadays, whenever I feel the need to escape the commonplace that is my destiny, I just read through the chronicles of last years best explorations [http://www.mounteverest.net ] . It isn’t just the sheer determination that stands out in these people, but also their absolute love for adventure. Moves me enough to bring a spring back to my step.
Most of the 8000+ mountains of the world are in the Himalayas. The tallest and the toughest climbs are all there. Mountaineers Mecca bang in the middle of one of the most politically charged landscapes in the world.
Jannu [pic] is a vertical rock face of 3000 meters at an altitude of 7000+ meters. The story of the Russians who went straight up its incline is simply heroic. Pure need to redefine excellence. So too the Catalans who crossed the magic line on K2. When these guys make a statement you just have to believe them.
Specifically what is it that causes major differences in philosophy about what the end is?
A little bit of history first. Understand that this is what I know, being a mortal with an irresistible need to question, I ponder without accurately checking facts. The way I understand it, Shankaracharya brought about the first major revival of Hindu philosophy in the 8th century AD. He propounded on all the major scriptures and founded what is called 'advaithic thought'. Basically that self in a truly realized person unites with the Lord of Love, the self resides in all of cosmos, and is the only thing that never changes. Subsequent teachers differ in Shankaracharya about this. For example Ramanujacharya, who propounded his version of the scriptures around the 13th century AD, says that the Self in a truly realized person is free from the eternal cycle of life and death, but remains for all eternity in obeisance to the Lord of Love. This is today called ‘Vashishtadvaithic thought’. These philosophies were adopted by their disciples and passed down from family to family. I personally come from a family that believes in Ramanujacharya as the supreme teacher.
Now here come the questions. My understanding of philosophy is that the means are far more relevant than the end. Meaning all of us have to live our lives with self-control, compassion and renunciation. Meditation with teaching from a learned guru will get us closer to escaping the eternal cycles of life. Nobody can really know specifically what happens to the Self when a person attains moksha, because the plane at which the self is realized is indescribable. So WHAT is it that occurred in 13th century India that caused the need for a change in the description of what is essentially indescribable? What would Ramanujacharya have felt changing the entire interpretation of the end when he himself could only hope to attain it on his demise? What the families caught between these philosophies felt, what if they followed the wrong philosophy [ ok they must have thought, the means are the same so that is no issue, but what if the philosophy is a lie, propounded by a pressing need to alter the essential meaning due to going’s on in this samsara]. And of course, how much of Shankaracharya's thought was influenced by going's on around him.
The intent of this dialogue is not to malign but to try and understand what my ancestors thought's were.
As mode of catharsis and time pass I venture into thee.
So what am I up to? Besides phaffing around and the daily ritual of looking at furthering my CV, I am trying to learn two languages. Sanskrit and Tamil.
Sanskrit, because I love its verses. I love the way everything about it appears to be linked to the divine. I’m honestly trying to go through an abridged snippet version of the Upanishads. Most of whatever I read fits in with my own core beliefs. Yeah, a case of the stupid judging the wise. But I need to question. The interpreter’s text is always poetic, always beautiful, and sometimes so nihilistic. The self within must be realized, not learnt, or sensed. Rituals will not get you there, he actually says that rituals are too feeble a raft to be navigating through samsara, and the participants are like the blind leading the blind. That’s a Hindu telling a Hindu 'most of what you do is crap dude'. Leave what ever you do and go find a teacher, and through his teachings realize the self. Obviously this would have meant the end of a religion, because there would be none to live and procreate, so there are other Upanishad’s, which differ in thought. And of course best of all they always end in Om shanti shanti shanti:
Tamil because I was born into this language but never gave it the importance it deserves. Honestly I am finding the going tough because both of them are so complex. But as with all my projects, I have a lifetime to realize their completion.